Posted by: amunhotep | August 5, 2008

Devil in Disguise

With the Louisiana decision to promote Intelligent Design (a particular form defined by the Discovery Institute) I have bought a book from Amazon and read it straight away, which is unusual for me J.  I found “The Devil in Dover”, both informative and concerning.  Lauri Lebo, the author and resident of the area where the events took place gives us a very personal and detailed account of how the Fundamentalist Christian Creationists brought shame and expenses to the Dover Pennsylvania School Board, as well as personal heartache and stress.

Watching “Judgment Day” and “Flock of Dodos” is not enough, after Lebo there is a satisfaction that we can understand both sides of the Kitzmiller et al vs. Dover Area School District in the narrative Lebo gives us and we end up with a deeper understanding of the effects on both sides of this case.  From Lauri Lebo herself to the two who started the whole thing, William Buckingham and Alan Bonsell.

The invitation to the Discovery Institute and the Thomas More Law Centre for the Defendants, The ACLU and the Pepper Hamilton LLP for the Complainants.  The battle lines were drawn by a thorough research on one side and a lazy attitude to research on the other.  An example was Barbara Forrest’s testimony, the amount of work she and her associates did on the Of Pandas and People book was a detectives nightmare, yet they persisted with the tenacity only someone who understands science could do.  This sort of dedication to their case was not evident in their testimony, in fact they managed to contradict and show their lying.  Which must have been embarrassing for they were claiming to be followers of Jesus Christ!!

Buckingham’s health became an issue unfortunately and his addiction to a prescription drug became evidence about his inability to remember what happened.  Bonsell just failed any test given him, remaining ignorant about the costs to the School Board he had personally caused due to this whole Creationist nonsense.

I will be interested to see a legal discussion and commentary on this case, from one of the prosecutors, as their comments in “Judgment Day” were incisive and interesting.  The case is a primary reference on the subject of the “Wall of Separation” that is guaranteed in the US Constitution, something I would like to see here after John Howards attempts to introduce Religious Counseling in Schools.

In the US the influence of the Fundamentalist Christian Evangelical people is built into the current Government of George W Bush, in the Military and within State Republican Parties.  For example, an anti-evolution statement is in the Texas Republican Party Platform, so we can expect trouble there, and guess what, yes, it has happened.  More about that later perhaps.  What about Florida and Louisiana?


Responses

  1. As to the amount of work put in by the expert witnesses, don’t forget that Forrest, Miller, and all the other plaintiffs’ witnesses served for free. The defendant’s witnesses, on the other hand, received fees. Dembski got $20K up front, and didn’t return any part of it when he refused to be deposed or to testify.

  2. Yes, the unbalanced approach to the whole episode became evident when Discovery Institute pulled out, including Dembski. They of course understood they would loose the case. The ACLU did a great job and Barbara Forrest and her associate exposed the creationism background in their own recommended publication Of Pandas and People, which just showed the whole perfidy of the defendants.


Leave a response

Your response:

Categories